Being blocked by 54 filibusters aimed mostly against conservative judicial appointments by George W. Bush, in 2005 Republican majority leaders made a pitch to abolish the filibuster.www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/05/10/filibuster_ban_gets_white_house_nudge/
Should a strong Democratic majority -- 58, assuming the still contested Minnesota and Georgia seats don't turn blue -- attempt to do the same?
Like Rodney Dangerfield, this Congress doesn't get much respect. Americans rate it slightly above sludge, but below George Bush, the least admired president in the history of polling.
Who gets the blame for the so-called "Do Nothing Congress?"
Well, as the chart from Secretary of the Senate, shows from January 4, 2007 through November 25, 2008, 138 cloture motions have been filed. That's 34 more than the record-setting chart at the right shows.
Majority rule has essentially been repealed by the F-word Congress. Without the super-majority of sixty votes to end the filibusters, the accomplishments of the 110th Congress were limited (GI-Bill, Children's Health Care and minimum wage as riders as notable exceptions to Progressives; continued stimulus packages to all Americans a victory in the conservative column). The 'Do Nothingness' was reinforced by over 131 veto threats by President Bush (who never issued a veto when Republican majority Congresses ran up record deficits on Capitol Hill).
So the question for the new 111th Congress coming in January, should it move to remove the filibuster? Or is the procedure a needed part of the Cup and Saucer dance that is currently like a slow Washington waltz?
Here is a look at how that 111th Congress breaks down, statistically.
www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/pdfs/NM-guide-statistics.pdf






