The headline in Al Jazeera was a bit misleading (the "Nigerian leaders" are actually former Nigerian leaders), but the article does describe an aspect of Nigeria's regime. Nine gubernatorial races have been overturned and elections rerun since last year's elections. Losers in previous fourth republic presidential elections have challenged the results in court. Why should last year's losers be any different?In my mind, the significant thing is that the challenges are taking place in the courts -- within the regime.
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/89C4FBFD-C58B-43DD-9E4A-9B0454C312AC.htm
Nigeria's supreme court has begun hearing an appeal by opposition leaders against the victory of Umaru Yar'Adua, the country's president, in last year's elections."
Atiku Abubakar and Mohammadu Buhari [at right], two opposition candidates, have asked the court to overturn a lower court ruling that upheld Yar'Adua's victory in the April 2007 vote..."
The hearing, which started on Tuesday in the capital, Abuja, has been adjourned indefinitely to allow for more legal briefs to be filed..."The opposition wants the final tally to be disregarded and another election to be held..."
The case is likely to drag on for several months because once Yar'Adua has made his case, Buhari and Abubakar have a further three weeks in which to reply..."
The seven-judge bench of the supreme court hearing Buhari and Abubakar's petition goes into recess in July and only resumes in September, lawyers said..."
_____________________
Leadership, a newspaper in Abuja, described the situation this way:
2 comments:
I cannot believe that the supreme court will actually decide on this issue. The president (who still has strong ties to the military ("ex" general))does not just make the decision himself. The strength of the judicial branch is easily overcome by an AK.
Nigeria is not going to get anywhere until it can figure out how to have a peaceful election. At least they seem to have moved beyond military rule, if only for the time being.
Post a Comment