Monday, March 3, 2014

Traditional Government: Campaign Finance Flipped Lesson


Since the days of Andrew Jackson, campaign financing in America has been a controversial, confusing and important issue effecting elections in our republic. All you will need to know and more on Wednesday's Test on Campaign Financing (Glencoe, Pgs. 477-479) is here. This "flipped" lesson will need to be completed in the comment section here by Thursday, 3/6, but you need to know most of this stuff for Wednesday's test.

Campaign Finance History in US
Click on the Link and take notes

1) Define: a) Buckley v. Valeo (1976); b) Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act (2002); c) Citizens United v. FEC (2011).

2) Watch the video above and identify the Citizens United vs. FEC case and explain its impact on elections in the U.S. today.

 

3) Analyze the charts above and View the Prezi presentation below (thanks, Maura O'Kane). In a sentence or two, what's the biggest takeaway?
Campaign Finance Prezi
4) What is a Lobbyist and what is a PAC? Other than monetary donations, how can they influence (for better and worse) the legislative process.....Jack Abramoff was the King of K Street (the HQ of lobbyists in Washington) until he went to prison on 2006. They made a movie about him starring Kevin Spacey.

 
 
5) Just for kicks, Colbert Super PAC meets disenter John Paul Stevens. Stevens doesn't think Corporations should have "Free Speech Rights." But the majority of the Supreme Court (5) did in a ruling that "created" Super PACs. What is the influence on our elections today?

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

1. Buckey v. Valeo: restriction on the amount of money a person can spend on political communication during a campaign

Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act: introduced many changes to federal campaign finance law; contained soft money and campaign ads

Citizens United v. FEC: prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions


2. The Citizens United v. FEC impacts elections in the US today by allowing money to influence the electoral process and as a result, getting serious about regulation and reform.


3. I think that the biggest takeaway from looking at the graphs and the prezi is that campaign finance has sky-rocketed from ads that you always see on tv, and spending and contributions.


4. Lobbyist: someone who tries to influence decisions made by officials in the government

PAC: the political action committee is an organization that raises money privately to influence elections or legislation

These influence the legislative process by giving a voice in assisting legislators to become elected.


5. The influences on our elections today are family influences, social media, etc...

Anonymous said...

1. a) Case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a federal law which set limits on campaign contributions, but ruled that spending money to influence elections is a form of constitutionally protected free speech, and struck down portions of the law
b)includes several provisions designed to end the use of non-federal(money raised outside the limits and prohibitions of federal campaign finance law) for activity affecting federal elections.
c)the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions
2. Corporations can spend as much money as they want in influencing elections
3.The media has helped in the increase for campaign finance
4. Lobbyist-a person who tries to influence legislation on behalf of a special interest
PAC-Political Action Committee A committee formed by business, labor, or other special-interest groups to raise money and make contributions to the campaigns of political candidates whom they support.
5. Our peers, & the media

Unknown said...


1. a) This is a Case where the Supreme Court sets limits to the contributions in campaigns. But was also decided that spending money on elections was something that is considered freedom of speech just like in the constitutions which made this law not happen. B) The finance reform act causing many changes in federal campaign with less money in campaign C) doesn’t allow government to make political independence or expenditures by corporations more strict.

2.comapnies and corporations can spend, as much money as they think is necessary for elections.

3. The biggest takeaway is that the media has very heavily impacted campaign finances

4. A lobbyist is a person who tries to change the outcome of legislation from special interest. A PAC stands for political action committee. Business, labor and other groups raising money to help out and support a campaign create this committee.

5. Our main influences for elections is the media, are families, and social media

Anonymous said...

1. A) Buckley Vs. Valeo: A case where the Supreme Court limited the amount of contribution to a campaign. B) Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act: Caused the increased role of soft money in campaign, with changes to federal campaign finance law. C) Citizens United v. FEC: Prohibiting the government from restricting political expenditures by corporations, associations, labor unions.

2. Citizens United vs. FEC Case: During elections the corporations can spend as much money as they please to influence elections.

3. The biggest take away from that was that the media impacted the campaigns heavily.

4. A lobbyist a person who tries to influence decisions made by the government. A PAC is a political action committee. Where an organization raises money to help out and support a campaign.

5.Influences on our elections today are family, peers, media, etc.

Anonymous said...

1) a-Buckley v. Valeo is when the Supreme Court sets limits to how much money can be contributed to a campaign
b- Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform introduced many changes and provisions with less money in the campaign, soft money was used to campaign.
c-Citizens United v. FEC is the First Amendment prohibiting the government to make political restrictions on political expenditures by unions, corporations, etc.

2)The Citizen United v. FEC has an effect on elections because it allows corporations to spend as much money as they feel is necessary on their election campaign

3)The biggest takeaway from the charts is the the more media a campaign gets the more the campaigning finances increases

4)A Lobbyist is a person who tries to influence or change the outcome of decisions made by legislation due to special interests
PAC, or political action committee, is an orginization formed to raise money for a politcal campaign. These include buisness and special interest groups.

5)Influences in our election include family, friends, peers, media, and social networking

Unknown said...

1.a)Supreme court ruled that there were limits to amound of money that can be spent on a campaign b)provisions to stop non-fed money from affecting elections c)Supreme Court said 1st amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions
2)Corparations can now use as much money as they can to help their candidate
3)The thing I took away was just how much more money is being spent on these elections and how crazy that is
4)Lobbyist-a person who tries to influence legislation on behalf of a special interest
PAC-A committee formed by business, labor, or other special-interest groups to raise money and make contributions to the campaigns of political candidates whom they support.
5)Some influences today are family, our friends, and social media

Anonymous said...

1.
A.) Buckey vs Valeo: Made restrictions on how much money a specific individual can spend on their poltical campaign
B.) Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act: Introduced many changes that forbidded any non-federal money to be used to affect federal elections. They could only use soft money, not hard money.
C.)Citizens United vs FEC: A case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.

2. The Citizens United vs FEC impacts elections today by allowing companies to spend as much money as they want in their political campaign without regulations. It makes money influence the voting process.

3. The biggest thing that I took away from the ads is that the financing for campaigning has risen every year and is getting out of hand. This money could be used to actually help the country instead of try to be elected.

4. Lobbyist is the act of trying to influence government decisions.
A PAC stands for political action committee. It is a committee that tries to raise money for a campaign to help that candidate get elected.
5. The influences on U.S. elections today are social media, money, family, social beliefs, and more.

Anonymous said...

Numero Uno.)
Buckey v. Valeo- Was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down several provisions in the 1974 Amendment to a law that limited campaign expenditures, independent expenditures by individuals and groups, and expenditures by a candidate from personal funds.

Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act includes several provisions designed to end the use of nonfederal, or "soft money" (money raised outside the limits and prohibitions of federal campaign finance law) for activity affecting federal elections. Kinda like:
•Prohibiting national parties from raising or spending nonfederal funds

Citizens United v. FEC:prohibits the government from restricting polital independent expenditures by corporations associations or labor unions.

Numero Dos.)corporations can spend as much money as they want to infuence the election

Numero Tres.)Ads cost a lot and we always see them on tv

Numero cuarto.)lobbyist is a person who tries to change the outcome of legislation from special interest.

Numero cinco.)our family and friends.all of social media.

Nicole Salvo said...

1. Buckley v. Valeo is a limit on the amount of money someone could spend on political communications during their campaign.

Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act is an act that made changes to the federal campaign finance law to end the use of non-federal money that's raised.

Citizens United v. FEC prohibits the government from restricting political expenditures by corporations, associations, and labor unions.


2. The Citizens United v. FEC impacts our elections by letting money impact the electoral process.

3. I believe the biggest "takeaway" by looking at the graphs and prezi is the campaign finances impact on elections.

4. A lobbyist is someone that tries to influence decisions made by officials in the government.

PAC is the political action committee which raises money to influence the elections.

5. Our family, social networking, media, peers, etc.

Anonymous said...

1. a) The case in which the Supreme Court set limits on the amount allowed to be spent on campaign contribution.
b)Increased the role of soft money in political campaigns as the law places limits on the contributions by interest groups and national political parties.
c) Prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.

2. Campaigns have no limit to the money they can spend to try and influence voters in elections.

3. The media has highly impacted the money campaigns use and has caused them to increase greatly.

4. Lobbyist- A person who tries to influence legislation on behalf of a special interest.
PAC- An organization that raises money privately to influence elections or legislation, especially at the federal level.

5. Family, Media, Friends and/or Peers, & Social Media

Anonymous said...

1.Buckey v. Valeo:introduced the idea that money counts as speech, and prohibited any restraints on unlimited spending in US election campaigns.

Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act:regulates the financing of political campaigns.

Citizens United v. FEC: Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.

2. During elections as much money can be spent as seen possible.

3. The biggest influence is how much money and media has affected the campaign process.

4. A lobbyist is someone who influences decisions made by the government.
PAC is the political action committee that raises private money to help legislators being elected.

5. The influences on our elections are media, family, and peers.

Jessica Taylor said...

1.) A- It was when the Supreme Court said no to changes in the 1974 Amendment a law that limited campaign expenditures, independent expenditures by individuals and groups, and expenditures by a candidate from personal funds.
B- It is used to restrict the use of soft money for federal elections. It also put a limit on national parties from raising or spending nonfederal funds. It required the states, district and local party committees to fund certain federal election activities with federal funds. lastly it put a limit on the fundraising done by federal and nonfederal candidates and officeholders on behalf of party
C- A law in which the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions. The conservative lobbying group Citizen


2.) The big corporations are putting big money into certain candidates that will benefit them over what will benefit the nation.
3.) The government is trying to make political funding fair for everyone but companies keep finding loopholes.
4.)A Lobbyist is a person the tries to influence legislation on behalf of a special interest. a PAC is a political Action Committee. They pool contributions from members and donates them to campaigns for or against candidates. They could be donating money to the wrong candidate and get the worst person in office.
5.)It made the elections not honesty anymore. Its a popularity contest, and to see who has the most money.

Unknown said...

1. a.) Buckey v. Valeo: Made restrictions on how much money a person can spend on their campaign.
b.) Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act: Introduced changes that forbidded any non-federal money to be used on federal elections. Only soft money could be used, not hard money.
c.) Citizens United v. FEC: The United States Supreme Court said that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, or labor unions.

2. The Citizens United vs FEC impacts elections today by allowing companies to spend as much money as they want in their campaign. Money can influence the voting process.

3. The biggest thing that I took away from the ads is how much people spend on their campaign ads and how crazy it is.

4. Lobbyist: trying to influence government decisions.
PAC:political action committee. A committee that tries to raise money for a campaign to help that candidate get elected.

5. The influences on U.S. elections today are family, media, money sometimes, and peers.

Unknown said...

1. Buckey vs. Valeo- the supreme court took away some provisions in the 1974 amendment to a law that limited the amount of money someone can spend on a political campaign.

Bi Partisan Campaign Finance Reform act-regulates the financing of political campaigns.

Citizens United vs. FEC- a case in which the supreme ct held that the 1st amendment prohibits expenditures by corporations.

2. the citizens united vs fec+ what affect is has on the elections today.
The case has an affect on the elections today because it let people spend money to effect the electoral process, and let the candidates spend money on their campaigns to show the voters that they are serious about change.

3. From looking at the graphs, etc. I have noticed that campaign finance has gotten so high compared to the past, from the ads on tv.

4.lobbyist: a person who persuades individuals/officials in government into making certain decisions.

PAC: the political action committee, organization that raises money to influence elections.

5. the influences on our elections are family, media, friends. etc.

Jessie Neil said...

1) Bucky v. Valeo-the govt set a regulation on how much a person can spend on a political campaign, but was then ruled unconstitutional and struck down some of the law
bi-partisan campaign finance reform act-ended the use of non-federal money in elections/campaigns
Citizens United v. FEC-allows corporations to spend however much money they want on campaigns because it is one of their rights
2) The Citizens United v. FEC created the ruling that corporations can spend however much money they want on campaigning and now that means they can influence voters by contributing large amounts of money to candidates who would better their corporation.
3)The biggest takeaway is how incredible the media has an influence on our opinions and voting
4)A lobbyist is someone who is trying to change the election for a special interest and PAC stands for political action committee that helps elect and defeats candidates. They could sway to get the best or worst person in office.
5) Family, social media/media, and peers

Jessie Neil said...

1) Bucky v. Valeo-the govt set a regulation on how much a person can spend on a political campaign, but was then ruled unconstitutional and struck down some of the law
bi-partisan campaign finance reform act-ended the use of non-federal money in elections/campaigns
Citizens United v. FEC-allows corporations to spend however much money they want on campaigns because it is one of their rights
2) The Citizens United v. FEC created the ruling that corporations can spend however much money they want on campaigning and now that means they can influence voters by contributing large amounts of money to candidates who would better their corporation.
3)The biggest takeaway is how incredible the media has an influence on our opinions and voting
4)A lobbyist is someone who is trying to change the election for a special interest and PAC stands for political action committee that helps elect and defeats candidates. They could sway to get the best or worst person in office.
5) Family, social media/media, and peers

Jessie Neil said...

1) Bucky v. Valeo-the govt set a regulation on how much a person can spend on a political campaign, but was then ruled unconstitutional and struck down some of the law
bi-partisan campaign finance reform act-ended the use of non-federal money in elections/campaigns
Citizens United v. FEC-allows corporations to spend however much money they want on campaigns because it is one of their rights
2) The Citizens United v. FEC created the ruling that corporations can spend however much money they want on campaigning and now that means they can influence voters by contributing large amounts of money to candidates who would better their corporation.
3)The biggest takeaway is how incredible the media has an influence on our opinions and voting
4)A lobbyist is someone who is trying to change the election for a special interest and PAC stands for political action committee that helps elect and defeats candidates. They could sway to get the best or worst person in office.
5) Family, social media/media, and peers

Courtney Smith said...

1.a) A supreme court case which eliminated laws restricting the contributions a person can make to a political campaign.
b) Bi-Partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act- designed to limit soft money's use in elections
c) Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting political independent expenditures by corporations, associations, and individuals
2. Increases the impact of money in today's elections as corporations and individuals can spend an unlimited amount of money on campaigning.
3. The biggest takeaway for me is the realizing the outrageous amount of money spent on campaigns today.
4. Lobbyist- a person who tries to influence legislation on behalf of a special interest
PAC-(Political Action Committee) a group formed to raise money privately to support their candidates
5. Today's influences include: social media, family, peers, money, etc.

oakleyses said...

nike huaraches, nike air max, lululemon, north face outlet, hermes belt, ralph lauren, iphone 6 plus cases, giuseppe zanotti outlet, s6 case, mac cosmetics, timberland boots, iphone 6 cases, iphone 6s cases, hollister, mcm handbags, ipad cases, iphone 6s plus cases, nfl jerseys, new balance shoes, herve leger, chi flat iron, mont blanc pens, ferragamo shoes, bottega veneta, soccer shoes, oakley, wedding dresses, insanity workout, iphone 5s cases, louboutin, p90x workout, beats by dre, hollister clothing, babyliss, north face outlet, valentino shoes, nike trainers uk, nike roshe run, jimmy choo outlet, abercrombie and fitch, soccer jerseys, baseball bats, celine handbags, ghd hair, longchamp uk, reebok outlet, iphone cases, asics running shoes, instyler, vans outlet

oakleyses said...

moncler, pandora jewelry, canada goose, toms shoes, canada goose outlet, converse, gucci, doudoune moncler, moncler, links of london, canada goose jackets, juicy couture outlet, moncler uk, ugg uk, hollister, canada goose outlet, marc jacobs, moncler, wedding dresses, pandora jewelry, vans, pandora charms, converse outlet, louis vuitton, canada goose uk, montre pas cher, moncler outlet, barbour uk, ugg pas cher, pandora uk, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, barbour, moncler, replica watches, lancel, hollister, karen millen uk, swarovski, louis vuitton, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, nike air max, louis vuitton, louis vuitton, ray ban, louis vuitton, moncler outlet, swarovski crystal, thomas sabo, juicy couture outlet, coach outlet, supra shoes, canada goose

yanmaneee said...

jordan shoes
nike off white
jordan 4
lebron shoes
supreme clothing
adidas nmd r1
kyrie 5
lebron 15
nike hyperdunk
golden gooses outlet

jasonbob said...

golden goose
off white jordan 1
jordan shoes
hermes
golden goose sneakers
kevin durant shoes
nike shox
kobe basketball shoes
golden goose