As The Guardian
writes, "The European Union is grappling with its deepest crisis in 60 years, a
malaise that goes beyond the euro debacle and the enormous tide of debt swamping
the continent. The union seems exhausted. Expansion has ground to a halt.
Sluggish EU economies are being eclipsed by rivals in Asia and Latin America.
"Brussels" has become a dirty word, no longer only in Britain...
"At this critical juncture, six leading newspapers
from the largest EU countries have come together in a joint project to build up
a more nuanced picture of the EU and explore what Europe does well and what not
so well.
"We begin by investigating the benefits the EU has
brought to 500 million people and later today examine the national leaders
labouring to steer it out of its current difficulties. Tomorrow we look at
euroscepticism and national stereotyping. At the end of the week, you can take
our "How European are you" test and see how you and other European readers
rank."
The series' home page at The Guardian is at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/europa
The College Board's article on the Challenges of EU enlargement is linked here (thanks to apgov.org)
Challenges of EU Enlargement
The Pint: A battle EU supporters couldn't win
A classic blurb re-run to teach about the European Union and its struggles when its bureaucratic rules, backed up by legislation from the European Parliament, challenge national sovereignty, sparks fly. What's a sovereign nation to do?In this, the latest example involving the EU and its members, the EU bureaucrats, using their wide range of discretion, seem to have backed down.
The defenders of pints, miles, and pounds (as weight, not money) are not entirely satisfied. By the way, those of us not in the UK (or the Republic o Ireland) might not understand that the pint is the most important of these traditional measures.
EU gives up on 'metric Britain'
The European Union is set to confirm it has abandoned what became one of its most unpopular policies among many British people."It is proposing to allow the UK to continue using pounds, miles and pints as units of measurement indefinitely..."Under the plans which have now been scrapped, even displaying the price of fruit and vegetables in pounds and ounces would have become grounds for a criminal prosecution."The decision to back down was made by Industry Commissioner Guenter Verheugen... 'I want to bring to an end a bitter, bitter battle that has lasted for decades and which in my view is completely pointless.
Bono: EU definition lies eight miles away
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1601932,00.html
(Sustainable development in Africa may be one the topic choices for our final exam project. Following the lead of my favorite rock star when he read the founding document of the EU, the Treaty of Rome, 2007, we will consider the EU's role in Africa here in this re-run post.)
In saying the West’s (particularly Europe’s) greatest depends on how it deals with Africa, Bono wrote in an essay in Time Magazine:
“Fast-forward 50 years. An Irish rock star reads the treaty with the enthusiasm a child has for cold peas but does uncover what I think technocrats might call poetry. Not much of it--just a turn of phrase here and there. Like Article 177, which summons the signatories to foster "the sustainable economic and social development of the developing countries and more particularly the most disadvantaged among them" and calls for a "campaign against poverty in the developing countries." Not exactly Thomas Jefferson but a glimpse of the kind of vision that might bind us.
Over the next 50 years, we might need a little more poetry. Europe is a thought that has to become a feeling--one based on the belief that Europe stands only if injustice falls and that we find our feet only when our neighbors stand with us in freedom and equality. Our humanity is diminished when we have no mission bigger than ourselves. And one way to define who we are might be to spend more time looking across the eight miles of Mediterranean Sea that separates Europe from Africa.
There's an Irish word, meitheal. It means that the people of the village help one another out most when the work is the hardest. Most Europeans are like that. As individual nations, we may argue over the garden fence, but when a neighbor's house goes up in flames, we pull together and put out the fire. History suggests it sometimes takes an emergency for us to draw closer. Looking inward won't cut it. As a professional navel gazer, I recommend against that form of therapy for anything other than songwriting. We discover who we are in service to one another, not the self.
Today many rooms in our neighbor's house, Africa, are in flames. From the genocide in Darfur to the deathbeds in Kigali, with six AIDS patients stacked onto one cot, from the child dying of malaria to the village without clean water, conditions in Africa are an affront to every value we Europeans have ever seen fit to put on paper. We see in Somalia and Sudan what happens if more militant forces fill the void and stir dissent within what is, for the most part, a pro-Western and moderate Muslim population. (Nearly half of Africa's people are devotees of Islam.) So whether as a moral or strategic imperative, it's folly to let this fire rage.”
The entire text of Bono’s essay is linked at the top. You, of course, can refer back to http://www.data.org/ for more information. The ONE Campaign is an example of a grassroots (really netroots) linkage institution.
As a group, the EU countries have committed 0.7% of GDP to help the poorest of the poor. So far, as the saying goes the check is, well, in the mail. At the end of the essay, the songwriter pens, “What will define Europe in this new era…..Part of the answer lines eight miles away.”
If only it could become a hit.
20 comments:
I don't think that the country will change. Mainly because they lose that "British quality" (or something like that) that GB has had for so long. GB likes to be individual and I think that it is one of the most important values that the Brits have.
(I'm hoping that this is the blog post we're supposed to comment on...)
I think the EU needs to perhaps become a little more economically conservative, taking into consideration their pretty dismal economic situation right now. I'm not saying they should refuse to help member countries embroiled in debt crises, but rather they should be more strict/have more restrictions and guidelines with their "financial aid" - I feel like there are many countries that have received EU money but have not done much to really change their debt/deficit situation, which leads to the EU continuously and fruitlessly pumping money into a situation that is stagnant because of a lack of action on the independent government's part. In the end, the EU loses a lot of money (and trust too, I think, from the richer member nations [i.e. Germany] that are pressured into contributing to these bailouts) and the economic crises in countries like Greece and Spain still aren't improving enough.
About the EU expansion thing, I think the sentence at the very end of the article(?) puts it well- while in many ways having more members can help to stabilize the EU's economy, the huge expansion also comes with a lot of questions and potential for difficulties in terms of ideological and decision-making unification, as well as a gap in income and lifestyles, among other things.
The metric system issue is kind of... there shouldn't have been a criminal punishment necessarily for using the British imperial system instead of the metric system (that seems a little overboard/harsh??) but at the same time, I'm not sure why they wouldn't use the metric system when everyone else does - it just makes things SO much easier. In fact, I'm honestly kind of not sure why the US doesn't use the metric system either.... I just remember what a pain it was trying to convert everything to metric for our middle school science fair. Not sure why a certain system of measurement is really considered a point of national pride?? It's more of an issue of simple practicality more than anything?
Bono's essay is very well-written... I pretty much agree with everything he's saying. Personally, I think the issue of Africa needs to be dealt with more strongly in terms of social issues and political corruption (which he mentioned) rather than just throwing money at the problem. A lot of the issues in Africa come from certain problematic social views and a LOT of political corruption and general utter political incompetence along with the economic problems that stem from neocolonialism and the colonial era. Africa is extremely rich in natural resources and has the potential to be an economically stable continent, but it will take serious and intense political, social, and economic reform before these resources can be used effectively.
In terms of the imperial versus metric system in England, although I think that it's silly to argue over a system of measurement when so many other issues deserve the talking time, I don't necessarily think that it's silly that Brits want to keep their own system. It may be inconvenient, but at this point in a globalizing world and in the face of EU supra-nationalism, I think that it's the little things (aka a pint) that really keep people from losing their sense of national identity. I'm not saying that this is a good thing, but it's the same thing for individual people, too... when we're all so much alike we fiercely protect the little things that make us different, or else we lose a sense of who we are, how we fit into the world and we lose the motivation to really do anything great. So if not having a unified measurement system is what it takes for us to cooperate over more important things without losing national zeal, well then so be it. I hope that made sense.
On another note, Bono's post really made me think and opened my eyes to other issues in the world (etc), I don't really understand the timing of it. He writes: “What will define Europe in this new era…..Part of the answer lines eight miles away.”, yet I don't agree that Africa is what will define this era. I think the survival of the EU is far too prevalent of an issue right now to be thinking over Africa. Europe needs to figure out exactly how it wants to unite under the EU (or if it is going to last at all) before they turn to other areas of the world. This isn't a morally-dry dilemma either: the future of the EU is a reflection of people's ideas of nationalism, altruism, equality, loyalty and openness... So I don't think that Africa doesn't need Europe's attention (from either a moral or a strategic standpoint), but I don't understand how exactly it fits into today's society.
I agree with Rashi. I mean, it's so difficult for the country to change, given the fact that they're so rooted in their traditions. I mean, being in the EU has posed as a great problem as, the country's no longer "unique" anymore, as it's joined a conglomeration of other countries.
To Alyson's point, the Bono essay was written in 2007, before the EU debt crisis. Maybe that's why it was important for the timing of the involvement. Right now Africa, even if 8 miles away, may be millions of miles off of Angela Merkel's (and the EU leaders) agenda.
Take a look at editorial cartoon #7, which illustrates the points Rashi and Shivani were making:
http://cas.illinoisstate.edu/sites/eu/files/2011/07/eu.cartoons.pdf
Parker N
I thoroughly enjoyed the part about bono and the "only as strong as your weakest member" mentality. It is something that I find is not present in most of the world, especially here in the united states. It seems like in the UK, some semblance of perspective is inherently had because of proximity. But here in the US, we are taught in a lot of respect that we are only as strong as our strongest member whether it be in school or to basic economics. Food for thought.
Overall I agree with Rashi with her point that GB should not change because it's that cultural quality that it has that sets it apart. Thats why I honestly think the EU is a bad idea because it's just a mash up of different countries with their cultures slowly decaying. Overall I think the GB does like to stay different just from the fact they do everything different from Europe from using the Pound to Left side driving.
To Karan and Rashi's point, isn't Texas or Alabama distinctly different than California, New York, or Chicago, for that matter. Are we not stonger with Unity -- despite our differences -- and wouldn't, couldn't the same be said for the EU?
Yes, the EU is in a tough situation right now economically but what Bono wrote about in Time magazine resonated. The EU should have a responsibility towards developing African Nations. Who knows, if they reach a point where they can become member nations of the EU then that could benefit the EU. It's not going to happen overnight but in the long run if the EU focuses a lot more on helping these nations then maybe a lot more good could come out of it.
I found this blog post really interesting. To me, the EU kind of seems culturally like an early United States, where all the people from different states would identify themselves by their state like Pennsylvanian or Georgian like in Europe they identify by Croatian or French. Enlarging the EU, like the blog post delved into, definitely causes more centrifugal cultural forces in this way - especially given the language differences that we never had to deal with in creating the United States. Economically, I think it definitely is benefiting the poorer countries but even the more affluent countries too as they have far less trade barriers. Great Britain's reluctance to switch to the metric system is humorous, yet very relatable as we in the US have the same problem... I agree with Jessica that it would be totally easier if we just used metric. On Bono's essay, I thought it was extremely well written. I think it is important for the EU to step out of their own bubble and help Africa, but at the same time, they have a load of cultural/economic strife going on within the organization already. If they can simultaneous manage it, then I think the idea should be explored further.
This blog post, particularly Bono's text, was really, really fascinating. I particularly liked the quote, "our humanity is diminished when we have no mission bigger than ourselves." I think that that really speaks to Britain's struggles with the EU because they are caught in the battle between appearing neighborly and involved in the rest of Europe and keeping their national pride and sovereignty--both of which have their merits. I think the metric system debate is really frivolous, to be honest. That's exactly the equivalent if the US started debating whether or not to switch to kilometers, grams, and liters. It's just a surface issue, while it may have deeper implications (like European conformity), that detracts political attention away from more pressing areas like national defense, the economy, and just about anything else you could think of other than pints vs. liters.
I completely agree with Taylor with her point on Britain converting to the metric system. There are honestly much deeper issues to be discussed that would have more of an impact on the country. The EU needs to really just kinda stop lending out all of their money because countries aren't attempting to change their economic system so the EU is putting money into a hopeless cause to say the least.
I think that the EU is a big step for many countries to take- in the fact that it requires them to be dependent on other nations sharing both good and bad times. While it definatly has been beneficial by lessening trade barriers and making european countries a stronger world power overall, when countries such as Greece start to spiral downwards the countries are partially responsible for their return to normalcy. This is when nationalistic flares are especially noticable- and people woul rather be part of their home country than the EU. I thik the EU will be something that is continually ratified for many years, trying to balance national identities while keeping up their importance in the world economically and politically.
European union membership obviously has many downsides to the UK. For starters, being apart of the EU means that you have just a little bit less control over yourself and your own economic policies. For many decisions within the UK, it is not up to the british citizens to make british decisions that will affect britain. It's up to a sort of international committee. Having the strong sense of nationalism that the British have, its very easy to see why losing sovereignty would be a major issue to them
European union membership obviously has many downsides to the UK. For starters, being apart of the EU means that you have just a little bit less control over yourself and your own economic policies. For many decisions within the UK, it is not up to the british citizens to make british decisions that will affect britain. It's up to a sort of international committee. Having the strong sense of nationalism that the British have, its very easy to see why losing sovereignty would be a major issue to them
Although its late :/
I agree with Kirin with the fact that there's a lot of issues with how the EU is ran and the pros and cons. Its easy to see how a lot of people dislike, or really like the idea of joining the EU. I think the intentions of the EU are good however there are still a ton of details and issues that need to be resolved in order for it to be fair for small, large and different countries to join. I think Bono did a great job and its really cool to see how active he is and how he incorporates these issues into his song; kinda reminds me of when McCartney wrote "Freedom" after 9/11. Its great to have amazing musicians do things like that.
U2's "Crumbs From Your Table" is exactly about this issue.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiSEqSDwgpA
The EU is obviously a work in progress; it is especially true during times of economic turmoil. If anything the EU should consider being more wary of how they go about making amendments to the situation, because obviously throwing money at the problem doesn’t completely deal with the problem. I think that if a nation decides the EU they should be aware of the fact that they are part of something that ties every European country participating in it. The EU should avoid being lenient on the subject of deficit because there are countries that have not been able to reach some sort of comprehensive plan to defeat their monetary deficits, and I think that their simply digging themselves a deeper hole by not fixing the root of the problem.
Don’t get me wrong though I definitely agree with the fact that the idea of the EU definitely has positive effects that for the most part outweigh the problems that the EU experiences.
Bono definitely has a clear idea over the role of Europe and the need to lend their assistance to Africa. It definitely felt like he made the effort of connecting to those that haven’t always considered Africa a concern of theirs. But at the same time, I would have to agree with what Alyson had mentioned I do believed that Europe should deal with their immediate concern: the EU’s economics. It would definitely be more beneficial for the EU to resolve their problems so that when they are finally settled they have the ability to work synergistically.
They’ll be a force to reckon with, once they do.
I find the motivation behind these decisions to be the most interesting part of the whole issue. Most prominently: the EU wants Great Britain to be a member so the European States can compete with the more economically and politically powerful nations of America and China. Great Britain is resistant to joining the EU because they are wary of the added restrictions on their national sovereignty (in terms of trade and other economics). As aforementioned, the idea of the EU is very intriguing in that it is attempting to unite several very diverse nations under common goals and boundaries. The fact is British nationalism is just a bit too strong (although nowhere near America in terms of selfishness) to become a part of the universally binding European Union. I am interested to see how the debates pan out in the years to come.
Post a Comment